AHC-LKO ordered bail for the applicant in a criminal case alleging abduction and sexual assault. The High Court granted bail due to discrepancies in the victim's statements and lack of medical evidence supporting the prosecution's case.
Release of applicant on bail under personal bonds and two sureties of Rs. 20,000/- each.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
Neutral Citation No. - 2024:AHC-LKO:43474
Court No. - 11
Case :- CRIMINAL MISC. BAIL APPLICATION No. - 3586 of 2024
Applicant :- Jainul Abdin Opposite Party :- State Of U.P. Thru. Its Prin.Secy. Home And 3 Others Counsel for Applicant :- Suresh Kumar Yadav Counsel for Opposite Party :- G.A.,Swatantra Lata Yadav
Hon'ble Pankaj Bhatia,J.
(a) The applicant shall execute a bond to undertake to attend the hearings;
(b) The applicant shall not commit any offence similar to the offence of which he is accused or suspected of the commission; and
(c) The applicant shall not directly or indirectly make any inducement, threat or promise to any person acquainted with the facts of the case so as to dissuade him from disclosing such facts to the Court or to any police ofÏcer or tamper with the evidence.
Order Date :- 19.6.2024
Shukla
Digitally signed by :- ASHUTOSH KUMAR SHUKLA High Court of Judicature at Allahabad, Lucknow Bench
1 issue framed by the court
Whether the applicant is entitled to bail given the huge variance in the victim's statements and lack of medical corroboration.
Jainul Abdin
State Of U.P.
AHWCJKumari
SujataMohan
As recorded by the court registry
5 orders share this CNR
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
