Petitioner sought mandamus for compassionate appointment on his father's death in harness, with a rival claim by his brother. Court permitted a fresh representation to be filed and directed respondent no.4 to decide it by reasoned order considering all claimants.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
Neutral Citation No. - 2024:AHC-LKO:35134
Court No. - 6
Case :- WRIT - A No. - 3515 of 2024
Petitioner :- Lal Bahadur
Respondent :- State Of U.P. Thru. Secy. Public Works Deptt. Lko. And Others Counsel for Petitioner :- Sukh Deo Singh,Paritosh Shukla Counsel for Respondent :- C.S.C.
Hon'ble Abdul Moin,J.
Order Date :- 7.5.2024 A. Katiyar
Digitally signed by :- AMIT KATIYAR High Court of Judicature at Allahabad, Lucknow Bench
1 issue framed by the court
Whether respondent no.4 should be directed to decide the petitioner's representation for compassionate appointment under the Dying in Harness Rules within a time frame.
1 provisions across 1 enactments
Lal Bahadur
State Of U.P. Thru. Secy. Public Works Deptt. Lko. And Others
Abdul Moin
As recorded by the court registry
2 orders share this CNR
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
