High Court judge held that the respondent state has no jurisdiction under Article 226 regarding the petitioner's appeal concerning government officials' postings within the state.
Petitioner's writ petition was dismissed as the respondent State lacked jurisdiction under Article 226.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
Neutral Citation No. - 2024:AHC-LKO:30362
Court No. - 19
Case :- WRIT - C No. - 3511 of 2024
Petitioner :- Smt. Rubina Bano
Respondent :- State Of U.P. Thru. Prin. Secy. Revenue Lko. And 9 Others Counsel for Petitioner :- Arjun Kumar Kaushal Counsel for Respondent :- C.S.C.,Mohan Singh
Hon'ble Subhash Vidyarthi,J.
Order Date :- 18.4.2024 Ankit
Digitally signed by :- ANKIT SHARMA High Court of Judicature at Allahabad, Lucknow Bench
1 issue framed by the court
Whether the respondent has jurisdiction under Article 226 of the Constitution regarding a matter involving government officials.
Smt. Rubina Bano
State Of U.P.
Subhash Vidyarthi
As recorded by the court registry
2 orders share this CNR
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
