specifically denied to have instituted any revision before the Board of Revenue bearing No. 2285 of 2021, which is shown to have been dismissed for want of prosecution on 26.10.2021. However, apart from dismissal in non prosecution, there was no further order and thereafter a ‘ Parwana Amaldaramad’ is shown to have been issued from the Board of Revenue, wherein apart from the dismissal of the revision, it was also directed to incorporate the names of the co-accused persons Amarjit and Nand Lal in the revenue records. The defence of the applicant appears to be that he has no concern with the land in dispute as he was not a recorded tenure holder of the same nor he is the beneficiary of the forged ‘ Parwana Amaldaramad’. Thus, it may not be believed that without any motive and not being the beneficiary, why he would commit such a mischief and therefore, the defence is that someone else has filed the revision before the Board of Revenue and got ‘ Parwana Amaldaramad’ issued in order to falsely implicate the applicant. Reliance has also been placed on FIR lodged by the instant applicant against two co-accused persons namely, Amarjit and Nand Lal. Thus, the case of the applicant appears to be distinguishable from the role of the aforementioned co-accused persons.
