Application to quash a criminal complaint case and summoning order after the parties settled their dispute by compromise. The Court disposed of the application, directing verification of the compromise by the court below, holding processes in abeyance meanwhile, with liberty to re-approach for quashing thereafter.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
Neutral Citation No. - 2024:AHC-LKO:75392
Court No. - 14
Case :- APPLICATION U/S 482 No. - 3312 of 2016
Applicant :- Chandrika Singh And 02 Ors. Opposite Party :- State Of U.P. And Anr. Counsel for Applicant :- Hari Shanker Tewari Counsel for Opposite Party :- Govt. Advocate,Pramod Kumar Singh
Hon'ble Ajai Kumar Srivastava-I,J.
applicants and the complainant have entered into a compromise on 20.08.2024. They have settled their dispute amicably out of the Court and have decided not to contest the case against each other. Copy of the compromise dated 20.08.2024 is on record as Annexure No.SA-2 to the supplementary afÏdavit.
same on record.
Order Date :- 14.11.2024 Mahesh
Digitally signed by :- MAHESH KUMAR High Court of Judicature at Allahabad, Lucknow Bench
1 issue framed by the court
Whether the criminal complaint proceedings and summoning order against the applicants should be quashed following the parties' compromise.
5 provisions across 2 enactments
Chandrika Singh
Subham Singh
Anshu Singh
State of U.P.
Gyanmati
Ajai Kumar Srivastava-I
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
