Disposed

Shesh Narayan Sharma v. State of U.P. Thru. Prin. Secy. Home Deptt. Lko. and 5 Others

Allahabad HC19 Jul 2024/3278/2024

Case brief

AI extract

What is this about?

Matters under Article 227. Single judge disposed of the petition by granting liberty to move an urgency application for expeditious disposal of a pending civil miscellaneous case in the additional district judge's court.

What did the court decide?

Liberty to the petitioner to move an urgency application for early disposal of the pending civil miscellaneous case before the Additional District Judge.

Shesh Narayan Sharma Vs State of U.P. Thru. Prin… — Writ and Judicial Review | Allahabad HC (2024)

¶1

Neutral Citation No. - 2024:AHC-LKO:48777

¶2

Court No. - 19

¶3

Case :- MATTERS UNDER ARTICLE 227 No. - 3278 of 2024

¶4

Petitioner :- Shesh Narayan Sharma Respondent :- State Of U.P. Thru. Prin. Secy. Home Deptt. Lko. And 5 Others Counsel for Petitioner :- Rajiv Kumar Bajpai,Anuja Bajpai,Suparna Mishra Counsel for Respondent :- C.S.C., M ohan Singh

¶5

Hon'ble Manish Kumar,J.

¶6

Heard.

¶7

Learned counsel for the petitioner has submitted that the present petition has been preferred for issuing a direction to the respondent no. 2- Additional District Judge/FTC IInd, Sultanpur to decide the Civil Misc. Case No. 145 of 2019 (Shesh Narayan Sharma Vs. Station of U.P. & others) under Section 50, 52 &54 Mental Health Act filed on 9.5.2019 which is pending till today before him, within the time as specified by this Court.

¶8

On being asked from the learned counsel for the petitioner whether petitioner has preferred any urgency application for early disposal of the aforesaid civil misc case, learned counsel for the petitioner has replied that no such application has been preferred before the Court concerned and petitioner has approached this Court directly for deciding the case expeditiously.

¶9

At this stage, learned counsel for the petitioner has submitted that present petition may be disposed of with a liberty to the petitioner to move an urgency application for early disposal of the aforesaid civil misc case before the Court concerned and if any such application is preferred by the petitioner the same may be decided by the respondent no.2 within the stipulated time fix by this Court.

¶10

Learned Standing Counsel has no objection to the prayer made by learned counsel for the petitioner.

¶11

On the request of learned counsel for the petitioner and without entering into the merit of the case, the present petition is disposed of with liberty to the petitioner to move an urgency application for early disposal of aforesaid civil misc case before the respondent no. 2. If any such application is preferred, it is

¶12

expected that respondent no. 2 shall decide the urgency application preferred by the petitioner looking into the urgency mentioned therein expeditiously in accordance with law, after giving opportunity of hearing to the parties concerned, in case there is no legal impediment and if any adjournment is unavoidable only short adjournment may be given.

¶13

Order Date :- 19.7.2024

¶14

Anuj Singh

¶15

Digitally signed by :- ANUJ PRATAP SINGH High Court of Judicature at Allahabad, Lucknow Bench

Shesh Narayan Sharma v. State of U.P. Thru. Prin. Secy. Home Deptt. Lko. and 5 Others

Case brief

What is this about?

What did the court decide?

Shesh Narayan Sharma v. State of U.P. Thru. Prin. Secy. Home Deptt. Lko. and 5 Others

Case brief

What is this about?

What did the court decide?

What the court decided

A compact analysis

Parties & counsel

Coram

Case details

All orders in this case

Similar cases

Anirudh Singh Vs State of U.P.through Secy.Labour Deptt.Civil Sectt.and Others

Rajendra Prasad Shukla Vs Union of India Thru General Manager N.E. Railway and Others

Dinesh Kumar Misra Vs Dev Narayan S/O Dewta Deen and Another

Veena Singh Vs Addl. Distt. and Sessions Judge Court No. 5 Lko. and 6 Others

Preeti Vs Civil Judge (J.D.) South Court No. 24 Distt. Sultanpur and Another

Atul Kumar and 3 Others Vs Anghad and 16 Others