Disposed

Trinetra Dey and Another v. Addl. Civil Judge Senior Division Court NO.21 Lko

Allahabad HC12 Jul 2024/3188/2024

Case brief

AI extract

What is this about?

Petitioner sought expeditious disposal of a pending civil suit under Article 227 order of the High Court. The court declined to pass further judicial orders due to existing administrative directions but granted liberty to move an urgent application to the trial court for expedited hearing.

What did the court decide?

Liberty granted to petitioner to move an urgent application to the trial court for expeditious disposal of the suit.

Trinetra Dey and Another Vs Addl. Civil Judge… — Writ and Judicial Review | Allahabad HC (2024)

¶1

Neutral Citation No. - 2024:AHC-LKO:47516

¶2

Court No. - 7

¶3

Case :- MATTERS UNDER ARTICLE 227 No. - 3188 of 2024

¶4

Petitioner :- Trinetra Dey And Another Respondent :- Addl. Civil Judge Senior Division Court No.21 Lko Counsel for Petitioner :- Mahesh Kumar Sharma

¶5

Hon'ble Alok Mathur,J.

¶6

Heard learned counsel for the petitioner.

¶7

By means of the present petition under Article 227 of the Constitution of India a prayer has been made for expeditious disposal of Case No. 348 of 2018 (Trinetra Dey and Others Vs. Estate of Late Shubhdeep and Others) pending before the Additional Civil Judge (Senior Division), Court No. 21, Lucknow.

¶8

Learned counsel for the petitioner submits that grievance of the petitioner would be sufficiently met in case the Additional Civil Judge (Senior Division), Court No. 21, Lucknow, considers and decides the aforesaid case in the time bound manner.

¶9

In this regard, it is noteworthy, that this Court on administrative side has already issued directions to the Courts below to obtain zero pendency of cases which are more than five years old. In view of directions already issued on administrative side, this Court is not inclined to pass any further order on judicial side. Hence, the prayer is rejected.

¶10

However, liberty is given to the petitioner to move appropriate application detailing urgency for expeditiously disposal of the suit before the trial Court. In case, such application is moved within two weeks from today the trial Court shall consider and decide the same expeditiously, say, within three weeks thereafter. In case, the trial Court is prima facie satisfied that a case for urgency is made out it shall pass suitable orders thereon and proceed accordingly with the proceedings of the case pending before it.

¶11

With aforesaid observation and direction the petition stands disposed of .

¶12

Order Date :- 12.7.2024 A. Verma

¶13

(Alok Mathur, J.)

¶14

Digitally signed by :- ANURAG VERMA High Court of Judicature at Allahabad, Lucknow Bench

Trinetra Dey and Another v. Addl. Civil Judge Senior Division Court NO.21 Lko

Case brief

What is this about?

What did the court decide?

Trinetra Dey and Another v. Addl. Civil Judge Senior Division Court NO.21 Lko

Case brief

What is this about?

What did the court decide?

What the court decided

A compact analysis

Issues for consideration

Parties & counsel

Coram

Case details

All orders in this case

Similar cases

Ramkirti and Others Vs State of U.P. Thru. Addl. Chief Secy. State Estate Deptt. Lko. and Others

Nathu Ram Vs State of U.P. Thru. Prin. Secy. Deptt. of Revenue Govt. Lko. and 6 Others

Mahrajdin Verma Vs State of U.P. Thru. Addl. Chief Secy. Food and Supply Lko. and 9 Others

The Commissioner Commercial Tax Lucknow Vs M/S Lancer Food Products Gautambudh Nagar

Maahey Laka Vs Sri Jamal Ahmad Khan and Another

Ram Lakhan and Another Vs Civil Judge (Junior Division ) Court No. 15 Sultanpur and 3 Others