Revision against two orders rejecting plea of minority and an application to summon a school principal for age proof. Court relied on Statutory preference for school certificates to determine age and dismissed revision for lack of merit.
Application rejected; orders of lower courts upheld with no merit found in the revision.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
Neutral Citation No. - 2024:AHC-LKO:5845
Court No. - 27
Case :- CRIMINAL REVISION No. - 31 of 2024 Revisionist :- Revisionist Is Minor 'R' Opposite Party :- State Of U.P. Thru. Prin. Secy. Home Lko. And 3 Others
Counsel for Revisionist :- Niranjan Singh Counsel for Opposite Party :- G.A.
Hon'ble Subhash Vidyarthi,J.
1.Case called out in the revised list.
incident i.e on 11.04.20201, he was a major.
(Subhash Vidyarthi,J.)
Order Date :- 19.1.2024 Preeti.
Digitally signed by :- PREETI GAUTAM High Court of Judicature at Allahabad, Lucknow Bench
3 issues framed by the court
Whether the High School admit card and mark sheet have precedence over other documents for determining the date of birth under Section 94 of the Juvenile Justice Act.
Whether the revision challenging the rejection of the juvenile plea and subsequent application for summoning a witness lacks merit.
Whether the principle of res judicata bar applies to summoning a witness after rejecting the plea of minority.
3 provisions across 3 enactments
'R'
State Of U.P.
Subhash Vidyarthi
As recorded by the court registry
2 orders share this CNR
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
