The High Court dismissed the contempt application under Section 12 of the Contempt of Courts Act as infructuous, noting the underlying representation had already been decided by the respondent authority.
The application is dismissed as infructuous.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
Neutral Citation No. - 2024:AHC-LKO:33031
Court No. - 8
Case :- CONTEMPT APPLICATION (CIVIL) No. - 3062 of 2022
Applicant :- Bansi Dhar Tiwari Opposite Party :- Sri Himanshu Kumar, Prin. Secy. Rural Engneering Deptt. Civil Secrtt. Lko. Counsel for Applicant :- Maneesh Pandey Counsel for Opposite Party :- Mohit Jauhari,C.S.C.
Hon'ble Rajeev Singh,J.
infructuous.
Order Date :- 27.4.2024 VKS
Digitally signed by :- VIVEK KUMAR SRIVASTAVA High Court of Judicature at Allahabad, Lucknow Bench
1 issue framed by the court
Whether the present contempt application is maintainable when the representation has already been decided by the respondent authority.
Colour shows how this judgement treated each authority
Prem Singh & Ors. Vs. State of U.P. & Ors.Referred¶8
Prem Singh & Ors. Vs. State of U.P. & Ors. (Special Leave to Petition No. 4371 of 2011)
1 provisions across 1 enactments
Bansi Dhar Tiwari
Sri Himanshu Kumar
Rajeev Singh
Vivek Kumar Srivastava
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
