her religion and when she raised objection, she was beaten. It is also alleged therein that appellant and other accused persons committed rape with her. On her objection, Javed dropped her at Karnailaganj Railway Station on 21.06.2022 by giving life threat and passing castic words. It is also mentioned in the F.I.R. that missing report was lodged on 14.06.20222 and after recovery of the victim, the information was also given to the police on 21.06.2022. Submission of the learned counsel for the appellant is that the victim is a major and prudent lady and she categorically admitted that she was in conversation with the co-accused, Javed. It is vehemently submitted that the victim went to Javed on her own and the F.I.R. has been lodged at the behest of her father implicating all the family members of Javed only with the intention to give lesson to him. It is also submitted that the medico legal examination does not support the prosecution story. It is next submitted that as the charge sheet has been filed by the Investigating OfÏcer, there is no possibility of tampering of any evidence. It is lastly submitted that the court below has not considered all these facts while rejecting the bail application and there is no possibility of conclusion of trial in near future. It is, thus, submitted that the impugned order is liable to be set aside and the appellant, who is in jail since 17.08.2022, is entitled for bail. It is also submitted that the appellant is ready to cooperate in the trial.
