In this PIL challenging the widening of land ceiling law limits from 120 to 125 acres, the petitioner questioned the admissibility of fresh land documents and alleged prior knowledge of the government's decision.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
Neutral Citation No. - 2024:AHC-LKO:27567
Court No. - 19
Case :- PUBLIC INTEREST LITIGATION (PIL) No. - 299 of 2024
Petitioner :- Laxmi Sahay Yadav Respondent :- State Of U.P. Thru. Addl. Chief Secy. Revenue Deptt. Lko. And 4 Others
Counsel for Petitioner :- Pradeep Kumar Yadav,Ramesh Kumar Yadav Counsel for Respondent :- C.S.C.,Mohan Singh
Hon'ble Subhash Vidyarthi,J.
Order Date :- 4.4.2024 Ankit
Digitally signed by :- ANKIT SHARMA High Court of Judicature at Allahabad, Lucknow Bench
2 issues framed by the court
Whether the petitioner can file a PIL under Article 226 regarding the widening of Land Ceiling Law limits.
Whether the alleged foreknowledge of the petitioner regarding land measurement changes creates a mandate to admit fresh papers.
Laxmi Sahay Yadav
State Of U.P. Thru. Addl. Chief Secy. Revenue Deptt. Lko.
Subhash Vidyarthi
As recorded by the court registry
2 orders share this CNR
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
