Writ petition under Article 227 seeking quashing of an ex-parte dismissal of a transfer application was dismissed as the petitioner could have applied for recall or restoration instead.
Writ petition dismissed; alternative remedy of recall/restoration maintained.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
Neutral Citation No. - 2024:AHC-LKO:45347
Court No. - 19
Case :- MATTERS UNDER ARTICLE 227 No. - 2929 of 2024
Petitioner :- Abhishek Verma Respondent :- Mamta Verma Counsel for Petitioner :- Yash Bharadwaj
Hon'ble Manish Kumar,J.
The present writ petition has been preferred for quashing of the ex-parte order dated 31.05.2024 passed by the Principal Judge, Family Court, Lucknow, whereby the transfer application preferred by the petitioner has been dismissed for want of prosecution as the petitioner had not appeared on the date fixed.
The petitioner has approached this Court directly without filing any recall/restoration application before the Principal Judge, Family court, Lucknow.
Remedy is available to the petitioner to move a recall/restoration application for recall of the impugned order dated 31.05.2024 instead of filing the present writ petition under Article 227 of the Constitution of India.
In view of the above, the present writ petition is dismissed.
However, it is open for the petitioner to move a recall/restoration application before the court concerned.
Order Date :- 4.7.2024 Nitesh
Digitally signed by :- NITESH KUMAR TEWARY High Court of Judicature at Allahabad, Lucknow Bench
1 issue framed by the court
Whether a writ petition for quashing of an ex-parte dismissal of a transfer application is maintainable when an alternative remedy of recall exists
1 provisions across 1 enactments
Abhishek Verma
Mamta Verma
Manish Kumar
Nitesh Kumar Tewary
As recorded by the court registry
3 orders share this CNR
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
