The High Court Husband; the respondent was directed to decide the petitioner's application for compassionate appointment within two months.
The respondent no. 03 was directed to decide the petitioner's representation for compassionate appointment within two months.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
Neutral Citation No. - 2024:AHC-LKO:29639
Court No. - 8
Case :- WRIT - A No. - 2906 of 2024
Petitioner :- Smt. Indrawati Respondent :- State Of U.P. Thru. Its Prin. Secy. Deptt. Of Home, Civil Secrt. Lko. And Others Counsel for Petitioner :- Ashutosh Misra Counsel for Respondent :- C.S.C.
Hon'ble Rajeev Singh,J.
"(i) Issue writ order or direction in nature of mandamus commanding to opposite party no.3 that he take appropriate action in the matter and provide Compassionate Appointment to the petitioner under Dying In hardness Rule, in place of her husband as earliest in the interest of justice.
(ii) Issue writ order or direction in nature of mandamus commanding to opposite party no.3 that he consider the case of petitioner and grant the dues of the husband of the petitioner, (Contained as Annexure No.1) in the interest of justice."
Order Date :- 12.4.2024
Arpan
Digitally signed by :- ARPAN High Court of Judicature at Allahabad, Lucknow Bench
1 issue framed by the court
Whether the petitioner, a survivor of a deceased husband, is entitled to a direction for the decision of her application for compassionate appointment.
Smt. Indrawati
State Of U.P. Thru. Its Prin. Secy. Deptt. Of Home, Civil Secrt. Lko. And Others
Rajeev Singh
As recorded by the court registry
2 orders share this CNR
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
