Dismissed

Prashant Kumar Yadav @ Veeru Yadav v. State of U.P. Thru. Prin. Secy. Deptt. of Home, Lko. and Another

Allahabad HC21 Mar 2024/2748/2024

Case brief

AI extract

What is this about?

In a writ petition seeking directions to decide an arms license application, the Court held that without extraordinary circumstances demonstrating urgency, such directions cannot be issued in a routine manner given the petition was filed recently.

What did the court decide?

No direction issued to the licensing authority; petitioner advised to demonstrate urgency to the District Magistrate.

Prashant Kumar Yadav @ Veeru Yadav Vs State of U.P… — Service and Employment | Allahabad HC (2024)

¶1

Neutral Citation No. - 2024:AHC-LKO:25011

¶2

Court No. - 6

¶3

Case :- WRIT - C No. - 2748 of 2024

¶4

Petitioner :- Prashant Kumar Yadav @ Veeru Yadav Respondent :- State Of U.P. Thru. Prin. Secy. Deptt. Of Home, Lko. And Another Counsel for Petitioner :- Sanjay Bharti,Vinod Kumar Counsel for Respondent :- C.S.C.

¶5

Hon'ble Alok Mathur,J.

¶6

Heard Sri Sanjay Bharti, learned counsel for petitioner as well as learned Standing Counsel for respondents.

¶7

By means of present writ petition, the petitioner has prayed for a direction to the licensing authority i.e. district Magistrate, Lucknow to consider and decide his application for grant of arms license expeditiously.

¶8

It has been submitted that petitioner is a business man running a shop dealing in mobile phones and returns from his shop at odd hours during which he has threat to his life and liberty and consequently has moved an application for grant of arms license.

¶9

Considering the fact that the application was moved by the petitioner only on 16.11.2023 and only four months time have passed and subsequent to his filing there is no mention of any attack or any threat perception necessitating interference of this Court so as to direct District Magistrate to consider and decide his application within stipulated time.

¶10

This Court is of the considered view that unless there are extra-ordinary circumstances demonstrated by the petitioner, such directions cannot be made to the licensing authority in a routine manner. Nonetheless the licensing authority is also duty bound to consider and decide the applications expeditiously in accordance with law.

¶11

In light of the aforesaid observations, this Court declines to exercise its power under Article 226 of the Constitution of India, accordingly, the writ petition is dismissed .

¶12

In case, the petitioner feels that there is urgency in the matter, he is at liberty to move appropriate application before the District Magistrate demonstrating the said urgency and if such

¶13

an application is made, the District Magistrate shall proceed to consider and decide the same expeditiously.

¶14

(Alok Mathur, J.)

¶15

Order Date :- 21.3.2024 Ravi/

¶16

Digitally signed by :- RAVI SHANKAR SRIVASTAV High Court of Judicature at Allahabad, Lucknow Bench

Prashant Kumar Yadav @ Veeru Yadav v. State of U.P. Thru. Prin. Secy. Deptt. of Home, Lko. and Another

Case brief

What is this about?

What did the court decide?

Prashant Kumar Yadav @ Veeru Yadav v. State of U.P. Thru. Prin. Secy. Deptt. of Home, Lko. and Another

Case brief

What is this about?

What did the court decide?

What the court decided

A compact analysis

Issues for consideration

Statutes considered

Parties & counsel

Coram

Case details

All orders in this case

Similar cases

M/S S.S. Enterprises Lucknow Thru. Its Proprietor Raj Kumar Singh Vs State of U.P. Thru. Addl. Chief Secy. State Tax Deptt. Lko and 2 Others

M/S Pratyusha Enterprises Thru. Proprietor Mr. Piyush Kumar Mishra Vs Addl. Commissioner,Grade-Ii(Appeal)-Iv, State Tax Lucknow and Another

Mushtar Khan and Others Vs Raj Bahadur Singh and Others

Arun Kumar Dubey @ Arun Kumar Vs U.P. Sahkari Gram Vikas Bank Limited Lko. Thru. Branch Manager Distt. Faizabad

Vikash Singh and 19 Others Vs State of U.P. Thru. Prin. Secy. Revenue Deptt. U.P. Lko. and 5 Others

Vijay Bahadur Verma Vs State of U.P. Thru. Its Addl.Chief Secy. Deptt. of Revenue Lko and 4 Others