The single judge disposed of a writ petition without deciding on merits. The court directed the petitioner to submit a fresh representation before Respondent No. 3 to be decided within a fixed time frame.
Direction to submit fresh representation before Respondent No. 3 to be decided within fixed time frame.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
Neutral Citation No. - 2024:AHC-LKO:27665
Court No. - 6
Case :- WRIT - A No. - 2702 of 2024
Petitioner :- Suresh Chandra Verma Respondent :- The State Of U.P. Thru. The Secy. Revenue Deptt. Lko. And Others Counsel for Petitioner :- Ram Lakhan Vishwakarma,Sumer Chandra
Counsel for Respondent :- C.S.C.
Hon'ble Abdul Moin,J.
Order Date :- 4.4.2024
A. Katiyar
Digitally signed by :- AMIT KATIYAR High Court of Judicature at Allahabad, Lucknow Bench
Suresh Chandra Verma
The State Of U.P. Thru. The Secy. Revenue Deptt. Lko.
Respondent No. 3
Abdul Moin
As recorded by the court registry
2 orders share this CNR
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
