Under Article 227, the Court dismissed the writ petition as infructuous because the Learned Standing Counsel informed that the petitioner's application was decided on 16.07.2024, a fact undisputed by the petitioner's counsel.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
Court No. - 7
Case :- MATTERS UNDER ARTICLE 227 No. - 2492 of 2024
Petitioner :- Pavanesh Singh Respondent :- State Of U.P. Thru. Prin. Secy. Deptt. Of Revenue Civil Secrt. Lko. And 4 Others Counsel for Petitioner :- Niyaj Ahmad Counsel for Respondent :- C.S.C.
Hon'ble Alok Mathur,J.
(Alok Mathur, J.)
Order Date :- 19.7.2024
Ravi/
Digitally signed by :- RAVI SHANKAR SRIVASTAV High Court of Judicature at Allahabad, Lucknow Bench
Pavanesh Singh
State Of U.P.
Alok Mathur
As recorded by the court registry
4 orders share this CNR
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
