A High Court grant bail in a criminal case involving cheating and forgery charges under IPC and U.P. Sarvjanik Pariksha Adhiniyam. The court allowed the application as the investigation was concluded, noting no need for further custodial interrogation.
Applicant released on bail by providing personal bond and two sureties.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
Neutral Citation No. - 2024:AHC-LKO:34278
Court No. - 19
Case :- CRIMINAL MISC. BAIL APPLICATION No. - 2351 of 2024
Applicant :- Raushan Kumar Opposite Party :- State Of U.P. Thru. Prin. Secy. Deptt. Of Home U.P. Lko.
Counsel for Applicant :- Santosh Kumar Dwivedi,Pradeep Singh Somvanshi,Shivangi Mishra Counsel for Opposite Party :- G.A.
Hon'ble Subhash Vidyarthi,J.
(i) the applicant shall not tamper with the prosecution evidence;
(ii) the applicant shall not pressurize the prosecution witnesses;
(iii) the applicant shall appear on each and every date fixed by the trial court, unless his appearance is exempted by the learned trial court.
(Subhash Vidyarthi, J.)
Order Date :- 2.5.2024 Ram.
Digitally signed by :- RAM SINGH High Court of Judicature at Allahabad, Lucknow Bench
1 issue framed by the court
Whether the applicant is entitled to bail considering the conclusion of investigation and lack of need for custodial interrogation.
2 provisions across 2 enactments
Raushan Kumar
State Of U.P.
Subhash Vidyarthi
As recorded by the court registry
5 orders share this CNR
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
