Disposed¶11

Mohammad Afjal and 4 Others v. Board of Revenue,U.P. Lucknow Thru. Chairman and 3 Others

Allahabad HC6 May 2024/2230/2024

Case brief

AI extract

What is this about?

Neutral Citation 2024:AHC-LKO:34732; MATTERS UNDER ARTICLE 227 No. 2230 of 2024; Mohammad Afjal and others v. Board of Revenue, U.P. Lucknow; expeditious/timely disposal of pending revision; Section 333 U.P.Z.A. & L.R. Act, 1950; Revision No. 2862/2023 (R-20230412002862); urgency application for early disposal; Chairman, Board of Revenue U.P.; Manish Kumar, J.; decided 6.5.2024; petition disposed of with liberty, no adjudication on merits.

What did the court decide?

Liberty to the petitioner to move an urgency application for early disposal of Revision No. 2862/2023 before respondent no. 1; respondent no. 1 expected to decide any such application expeditiously in accordance with law after hearing the parties. ¶11

Mohammad Afjal and 4 Others Vs Board of… — Writ and Judicial Review | Allahabad HC (2024)

¶1

Neutral Citation No. - 2024:AHC-LKO:34732

¶2

Court No. - 18

¶3

Case :- MATTERS UNDER ARTICLE 227 No. - 2230 of 2024

¶4

Petitioner :- Mohammad Afjal And 4 Others Respondent :- Board Of Revenue,U.P. Lucknow Thru. Chairman And 3 Others Counsel for Petitioner :- Shyam Pratap Singh Counsel for Respondent :- C.S.C.,Mohan Singh

¶5

Hon'ble Manish Kumar,J.

¶6

Heard learned counsel for the parties and gone through the record of the case.

¶7

Learned counsel for the petitioner has submitted that the present writ petition has been preferred for issuing direction to the respondent no. 1/Chairman, Board Of Revenue,U.P. Lucknow to decide the revision no. 2862/2023 (computerized case no. R-20230412002862) titled as Mohammad Afjal and Ors. vs. Smt. Vandana and Ors, filed under Section 333 of U.P.Z.A. & L.R. Act, 1950 which is pending since 19.10.2023, within a stipulated time as this Hon'ble Court may fix.

¶8

On being specifically asked from learned counsel for the petitioner that whether the petitioner has preferred any application for early disposal of the revision by showing urgency in the matter before the Court concerned, it has been replied by learned counsel for the petitioner that no such application has been preferred before the Court concerned and petitioner has approached this Court directly for deciding the case expeditiously.

¶9

At this stage, learned counsel for the petitioner has submitted that present petition may be disposed of with a liberty to the petitioner to move an urgency application for early disposal of the revision before the Court concerned and if any such application is preferred by the petitioner the same may be decided by the respondent no. 1 within the stipulated time fix by this Court.

¶10

Learned Standing Counsel has no objection to the prayer made by learned counsel for the petitioner.

¶11

On the request of learned counsel for the petitioner and without entering into the merit of the case, the present petition is disposed of with liberty to the petitioner to move an urgency application for early disposal of revision no. 2862/2023 (computerized case no. R-20230412002862) titled as Mohammad Afjal and Ors. vs. Smt. Vandana and Ors, filed under Section 333 of U.P.Z.A. & L.R. Act, 1950 which is pending since 19.10.2023 before respondent no. 1. If any such application is preferred, it is expected that

¶12

respondent no. 1 shall decide the urgency application preferred by the petitioner expeditiously in accordance with law, after giving opportunity of hearing to the parties concerned and without providing any unnecessary adjournment to either of the parties.

¶13

Order Date :- 6.5.2024 Nitesh

¶14

Digitally signed by :- NITESH KUMAR TEWARY High Court of Judicature at Allahabad, Lucknow Bench

Mohammad Afjal and 4 Others v. Board of Revenue,U.P. Lucknow Thru. Chairman and 3 Others

Case brief

What is this about?

What did the court decide?

Mohammad Afjal and 4 Others v. Board of Revenue,U.P. Lucknow Thru. Chairman and 3 Others

Case brief

What is this about?

What did the court decide?

Why is it important?

What the court decided

Issues for consideration

Statutes considered

Procedural history

Parties & counsel

Coram

Case details

All orders in this case

Similar cases

Smt. Dile Rani Devi and Others Vs Commissioner Faizabad Division Faizabad and Others

Vijay Kumar Singh and Others Vs Addl. Commissioner (Admn), Ayodhya Division, Ayodhya and Others

Chhotelal @ Chhotan Vs State of U.P. Thru. Prin. Secy. Revenue Deptt. Lko. and 3 Others

Jagdish and Another Vs Deputy Director Consolidation Sitapur

Shiva Prasad Vs D.D.C. Kheri and Others

Prem Chandra Vs State of U.P. Thru. Prin. Secy. Revenue Deptt. Lko. and 10 Others