Disposed¶10

Smt. Kirti v. State of U.P. Thru. Prin. Secy. Home Deptt. Lko. and Others

Allahabad HC1 Apr 2024/215/2024

Case brief

AI extract

What is this about?

Section 483 CrPC; expeditious disposal of trial; direction to trial court; one-year timeline; no unnecessary adjournments; Complaint Case No.4784 of 2021; Sections 498-A, 323, 504 IPC; Section 3/4 Dowry Prohibition Act; P.S. Kotwali Nagar, District Sitapur; Judicial Magistrate IInd Sitapur; applicant Smt. Kirti; State of U.P.; Neutral Citation 2024:AHC-LKO:26635; decided 1.4.2024; petition disposed of finally.

What did the court decide?

Direction to the learned Judicial Magistrate IIInd, Sitapur to decide Complaint Case No.4784 of 2021 expeditiously within one year from the date of filing of the certified copy of the order, without unnecessary adjournments to either party, unless there is a legal impediment or a higher-court stay; petition disposed of finally. ¶10

Smt. Kirti Vs State of U.P. Thru. Prin. Secy. Home… — Dowry and Cruelty | Allahabad HC (2024)

¶1

Neutral Citation No. - 2024:AHC-LKO:26635

¶2

Court No. - 27

¶3

Case :- APPLICATION U/S 483 No. - 215 of 2024 Applicant :- Smt. Kirti Opposite Party :- State Of U.P. Thru. Prin. Secy. Home Deptt. Lko. And Others Counsel for Applicant :- Mohd. Saidab Khan,Azad Hasan Idarisi Counsel for Opposite Party :- G.A.

¶4

Hon'ble Shamim Ahmed,J.

¶5

Heard Sri Mohd. Saidab Khan, learned counsel for the applicant as well as Sri S.P. Tiwari, learned A.G.A.-I for the State and perused the record.

¶6

This application under Section 483 Cr.P.C. has been filed by the applicant seeking a direction to the learned Judicial MagistrateIInd, Sitapur to expedite/conclude the trial and decide the Complaint Case No.4784 of 2021, under Sections 498-A, 323, 504 I.P.C. and Section 3/4 of Dowry Prohibition Act, Police Station Kotwali Nagar, District Sitapur.

¶7

Learned counsel for the applicant submits that a positive direction be given to the trial court to decide the aforesaid case within a stipulated period.

¶8

Learned A.G.A.-I has no objection on the prayer made by the learned counsel for the case and submits that a positive direction be given to the trial court to decide the case of the applicant, as merely keeping pending the same by the trial court does not suffice any purpose of the litigation.

¶9

In view of the statements made by the learned counsel for the parties, the trial court is directed to decide the aforesaid case expeditiously i.e. within one year, without granting any unnecessary adjournment to either of the parties from the date of filing of the certified copy of this order, unless there is some legal impediment or unless there is any order passed by the higher court staying the proceedings of the case.

¶10

With the aforesaid observation, the petition is disposed of finally.

¶11

It is clarified that the observations, if any, made in this order are strictly confined to the disposal of this petition and must not be construed to have any reflection on the ultimate merits of the case.

¶12

Order Date :- 1.4.2024/Saurabh

¶13

Digitally signed by :- SAURABH VERMA High Court of Judicature at Allahabad, Lucknow Bench

Smt. Kirti v. State of U.P. Thru. Prin. Secy. Home Deptt. Lko. and Others

Case brief

What is this about?

What did the court decide?

Smt. Kirti v. State of U.P. Thru. Prin. Secy. Home Deptt. Lko. and Others

Case brief

What is this about?

What did the court decide?

Why is it important?

What the court decided

Issues for consideration

Statutes considered

Procedural history

Parties & counsel

Coram

Case details

All orders in this case

Similar cases

Balakram Saroj and 3 Others Vs State of U.P. Thru. Prin. Secy. Home Lko. and Another

Ravindra Kumar Vs State of U.P. Thru. Addl. Chief Secy. Home Lko. and Another

Ravindra Kumar Gupta Alias Ravindra Kumar and Another Vs State of U.P. Thru. Its Addl. Chief Secy. Home, Civil Sectt. Lko. and Another

Bhola Vs State of U.P.

Mohd Furqan and 2 Others Vs State of U.P. Thru. Secy. Home, Deptt. U.P. Govt. Civil Sectt. Lko. and Another

Sudhir Kumar Alias Anil Kumar Patel and Another Vs State of U.P. Thru. Prin. Secy. Deptt. Home Civil Secrt. Lko. and Another