In Criminal Appeal No. 2145 of 2024, the Allahabad High Court dismissed the appellant's application for quashing of proceedings. The court directed the appellant to approach the trial court for bail within two weeks to obtain an expeditious decision.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
Neutral Citation No. - 2024:AHC-LKO:47252
Court No. - 11
Case :- CRIMINAL APPEAL No. - 2145 of 2024
Appellant :- Prem Kumar Yadav Respondent :- State Of U.P. Thru. Prin. Secy. Home Lko. And Another Counsel for Appellant :- Hom Narayan Awasthi Counsel for Respondent :- G.A.
Hon'ble Abdul Moin,J.
Heard learned counsel for appellant as well as learned Additional Government Advocate for State.
Learned counsel for appellant, after arguing for some time, submits that the present application may be dismissed as not pressed with liberty to file a bail application before the learned trial court which may be decided in view of law laid down by Supreme Court in the cases of Satender Kumar Antil versus Central Bureau of Investigation and another passed in Special Leave to Appeal (Cri) No.5191 of 2021 and Mahdoom Bava Vs. Central Bureau of Investigation arising out of S.L.P. (Crl.) No.376 of 2023 , to which learned A.G.A. has no objection.
In view of the above, prayer for quashing the impugned proceeding is refused. So far as other prayer is concerned, it is provided that in case the applicant appears before the trial court within two weeks' from today and applies for bail, the same shall be decided expeditiously by the learned trial court, in view of the law laid down by Supreme Court in the cases of Satender Kumar Antil's (supra) and Mahdoom Bava's (supra) .
The appeal is disposed of accordingly.
Order Date :- 11.7.2024 S. Shivhare
Digitally signed by :- SHASHANK SHIVHARE High Court of Judicature at Allahabad, Lucknow Bench
Colour shows how this judgement treated each authority
Satender Kumar Antil versus Central Bureau of Investigation and anotherRelied on¶7
Satender Kumar Antil versus Central Bureau of Investigation and another passed in Special Leave to Appeal (Cri) No.5191 of 2021
Mahdoom Bava Vs. Central Bureau of InvestigationRelied on¶7
Mahdoom Bava Vs. Central Bureau of Investigation arising out of S.L.P. (Crl.) No.376 of 2023
Prem Kumar Yadav
State Of U.P. Thru. Prin. Secy. Home Lko.
Abdul Moin
As recorded by the court registry
2 orders share this CNR
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
