Disposed¶12

Piyush Singh v. Commissioner , Prayagraj Mandal Prayagraj

Allahabad HC29 Apr 2024/2125/2024

Case brief

AI extract

What is this about?

Article 227 petition for time-bound disposal; Arms Act 1959 S.18 case (Case No. 283 of 2023 / C202302000000283, Piyush Singh Vs. State) before Commissioner, Prayagraj Division; direction to decide within three months of certified copy, if no legal impediment; bar on unnecessary adjournments except exceptional circumstances; expedited disposal; writ petition disposed of; Allahabad High Court Lucknow Bench; Alok Mathur, J.; order dated 29.4.2024; neutral citation 2024:AHC-LKO:33296.

What did the court decide?

Direction to the respondent Commissioner, Prayagraj Division, Prayagraj to decide Case No. 283 of 2023 expeditiously, say within three months from production of certified copy of the order, in accordance with law, if there is no legal impediment; writ petition disposed of accordingly. ¶12

Piyush Singh Vs Commissioner , Prayagraj Mandal… — Writ and Judicial Review | Allahabad HC (2024)

What the court decided

AI extract

Outcome

¶12

Issue for consideration

Whether the Commissioner, Prayagraj Division, Prayagraj should consider and decide Case No. 283 of 2023 (Piyush Singh Vs. State, under Section 18 of the Arms Act, 1959) in a time-bound manner.

¶8

Court's answer

Without entering into the merits, the respondent Commissioner, Prayagraj Division, Prayagraj is directed to decide Case No. 283 of 2023 (Computer Case No. C202302000000283 - Piyush Singh Vs. State), under Section 18 of the Arms Act, 1959, expeditiously, say within a period of three months from the date of production of certified copy of the order, in accordance with law, if there is no legal impediment.

¶10

Ratio / Principle

The parties to the case shall cooperate in its expeditious disposal and shall not seek unnecessary adjournments; the court concerned shall not grant such adjournments except in exceptional circumstances.

¶11

Detailed headnote1 paragraphs

Allahabad High Court (Lucknow Bench), MATTERS UNDER ARTICLE 227 No. 2125 of 2024, decided 29.4.2024 by Alok Mathur, J. (Neutral Citation 2024:AHC-LKO:33296). Petition under Article 227 of the Constitution by Piyush Singh seeking expeditious disposal of Case No. 283 of 2023 (Computer Case No. C202302000000283 - Piyush Singh Vs. State), under Section 18 of the Arms Act, 1959, pending before the Commissioner, Prayagraj Division, Prayagraj. Held: without entering into merits, the Commissioner is directed to decide the case expeditiously, say within three months from production of certified copy of the order, in accordance with law, if there is no legal impediment; parties to cooperate and neither side to seek nor be granted unnecessary adjournments save in exceptional circumstances. Writ petition disposed of.

¶1

Neutral Citation No. - 2024:AHC-LKO:33296

¶2

Court No. - 7

¶3

Case :- MATTERS UNDER ARTICLE 227 No. - 2125 of 2024

¶4

Petitioner :- Piyush Singh Respondent :- Commissioner , Prayagraj Mandal Prayagraj Counsel for Petitioner :- Anurag Singh Chauhan,Shameem Jahan Counsel for Respondent :- C.S.C.

¶5

Hon'ble Alok Mathur,J.

¶6

Heard learned counsel for the petitioner as well as learned Standing Counsel for the respondent.

¶7

By means of the present petition under Article 227 of the Constitution of India a prayer has been made for expeditious disposal of Case No. 283 of 2023 (Computer Case No. C202302000000283 - Piyush Singh Vs. State, under Section 18 of the Arms Act. 1959, pending before the Commissioner, Prayagraj Division, Prayagraj.

¶8

Learned counsel for the petitioner submits that grievance of the petitioner would be sufficiently met in case respondent he Commissioner, Prayagraj Division, Prayagraj, considers and decides the aforesaid case in the time bound manner.

¶9

Learned Standing Counsel has no objection to the aforesaid prayer.

¶10

Considering the facts and circumstances of the case, without entering into the merits, respondent he Commissioner, Prayagraj Division, Prayagraj, is directed to decide Case No. 283 of 2023 (Computer Case No. C202302000000283 - Piyush Singh Vs. State), under Section 18 of the Arms Act. 1959, expeditiously, say within a period of three months from the date of production of certified copy of this order, in accordance with law, if there is no legal impediment.

¶11

It is further directed that the parties to the case shall cooperate in expeditious disposal of the case and shall not seek any unnecessary adjournment, neither any such adjournment shall be granted by the Court concerned, except in exceptional circumstances.

¶12

With above observations/directions, the writ petition stands disposed of .

¶13

Order Date :- 29.4.2024 A. Verma

¶14

(Alok Mathur, J.)

¶15

Digitally signed by :- ANURAG VERMA High Court of Judicature at Allahabad, Lucknow Bench

Piyush Singh v. Commissioner , Prayagraj Mandal Prayagraj

Case brief

What is this about?

What did the court decide?

Piyush Singh v. Commissioner , Prayagraj Mandal Prayagraj

Case brief

What is this about?

What did the court decide?

Why is it important?

What the court decided

Issues for consideration

Statutes considered

Procedural history

Parties & counsel

Coram

Case details

All orders in this case

Similar cases

Karam Jeet Singh Vs Civil Judge S.D. Pratapgarh and Another

Sunita Dixit Vs Civil Judge, Junior Division,East Dist. Hardoi and 2 Others

Smt. Abhilasha Masih and Another Vs Additional Civil Judge (Sr. Div.) Court No. 43, Lko. and 3 Others

Prahlad Singh Chak Holder NO.70 Objection Filed Vs Deputy Director of Consolidation Kheri and 2 Others

Shakeel Ahmad and Others Vs Mushtaq and Others

Syed Mohd. Ashiyam Vs U.P. Waqf Tribunal Thru. Its Registrar Lko. and 3 Others