Pratik Verma @ Raj Verma v. State of U.P. and Anr.
Case brief
What is this about?
The anticipatory bail application was dismissed for want of prosecution as the applicant did not appear to press the matter.
The anticipatory bail application was dismissed for want of prosecution as the applicant did not appear to press the matter.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
Neutral Citation No. - 2024:AHC-LKO:22130
Court No. - 28
Case :- CRIMINAL MISC ANTICIPATORY BAIL APPLICATION U/S 438 CR.P.C. No. - 2120 of 2021
Applicant :- Pratik Verma @ Raj Verma Opposite Party :- State Of U.P. And Anr. Counsel for Applicant :- Arun Kumar Mishra Counsel for Opposite Party :- G.A.
Hon'ble Brij Raj Singh,J.
Case called out in revised. None appears for the applicant to press this application.
Shri Rajdeep Singh, learned AGA-I for the State is present.
Accordingly, the application is dismissed for want of prosecution.
Order Date :- 13.3.2024
Pks
Digitally signed by :- POOJA SETH High Court of Judicature at Allahabad, Lucknow Bench
1 provisions across 1 enactments
Pratik Verma @ Raj Verma
State Of U.P.
Brij Raj Singh
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court