In RERA Appeal No. 4 of 2023, the High Court allowed the withdrawal of the appeal as the matter had been compromised. Consequently, the appeal was dismissed as not pressed.
Application for withdrawal allowed; Appeal dismissed as not pressed.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
Neutral Citation No. - 2024:AHC-LKO:76126
Court No. - 7
Case :- RERA APPEAL No. - 4 of 2023
Appellant :- Shashank Sinha And Another Respondent :- M/S. Iitl Nimbus, The Express Park View, New Delhi Thru. Managing Director Counsel for Appellant :- Rudra Mani Shukla,Girish Chandra Sinha Counsel for Respondent :- Girish Dutt Pandey
Hon'ble Pankaj Bhatia,J.
I.A. No. 5 of 2024 - Application for Withdrawal of Appeal
The counsel for the applicant/appellant states that the matter has been compromised and he does not want to press the matter.
Consequently, the application is allowed.
The appeal is dismissed as not pressed.
Order Date :- 19.11.2024 VNP/-
Digitally signed by :- VISHVANATH PRASAD SHUKLA High Court of Judicature at Allahabad, Lucknow Bench
Shashank Sinha And Another
M/S. Iitl Nimbus, The Express Park View, New Delhi Thru. Managing Director
Pankaj Bhatia, J.
Vishvanath Prasad Shukla
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
