29th June 2004 and 30th September 2013. So far as the extension of tenure, till the academic session ending on 31th March 2025 is concerned, is opposed on the ground that extension in terms of Regulation 21 does not cover the further extension of academic session to the State Awardees. It is added that the Regulation 21 could be segregated in two distinct parts; the first part is that the age of superannuation for the post of Principal, Headmaster/Teachers to which, it attach the provisions of session benefit, allowing him to continue till the end of academic session, unless a written request is made to the contrary, two months prior to attaining the age of superannuation. Secondly, it contemplates extension in service in addition to the first part upon conditions that are prescribed by the State Government, that session benefits allowing the teachers to continue till the end of academic session, allowing the end of academic session under Regulation 21 is restricted only to the first part and not to the second part and this would not apply automatically unlike the first part and therefore, it is well within the domain of State Government to provide extension only up till the end of calander month, in which the petitioner will attain the age of superannuation and once an employee has attained the age of superannuation, he has no right to any continuance in service or any extension of his services, unless provided under any law.
