As per prosecution case, they visited the place of the appellant thrice for treatment by adopting some spiritual practice. It is alleged in the F.I.R. that earlier on two occasions, no misbehave was done by the appellant, but on 06.07.2022, she was confined in a room by the appellant and committed rape with her. It is also alleged therein that due to incident, some blood was oozing from her genital part and on the advice of the appellant, the genital part was washed by the victim in washroom. The blood, which fell on the floor, was washed by the appellant. 7. Submission of the learned counsel for the appellant is that at the time of incident, victim's mother, brother and maternal grand daughter were also there, but the victim did not speak about the incident to them immediately and after coming back to the house, she narrated the incident. It is further submitted that the temple is well equipped with the CCTV cameras and the movement of the victim and other family members, who visited the temple, was also captured in the CCTV, in which, they are seen going back very comfortably. Learned counsel for the appellant vehemently submits that while rejecting Criminal Appeal 2798 of 2022, this Court directed the trial court to conclude the trial without giving adjournments to either of the parties, but till today, only 2 witnesses, i.e., victim and her mother (informant) have been examined, out of total 20 witnesses. It is also submitted that there is major contradictions in the depositions of the victim and her mother recorded before the trial court. It is next submitted that as the victim and the informant have already been
