In a contempt application regarding compliance with a Writ Court order, the Court noted that the impugned order had already been complied with. The application was dismissed as infructuous.
Application dismissed as infructuous due to compliance with the Writ Court order.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
Neutral Citation No. - 2024:AHC-LKO:40320
Court No. - 8
Case :- CONTEMPT APPLICATION (CIVIL) No. - 1465 of 2024
Applicant :- Uma Pandey Opposite Party :- Dr. Indramani Tripathi, Vice Chairman Lko. Development Authority, Lko. Counsel for Applicant :- Shailender Singh,Ankit Tiwari,Divya Niranjan,Neelam Singh,Varun Kumar Mishra Counsel for Opposite Party :- Ratnesh Chandra
Hon'ble Rajeev Singh,J.
Order Date :- 27.5.2024 Arpan
Digitally signed by :- ARPAN High Court of Judicature at Allahabad, Lucknow Bench
Uma Pandey
Rajeev Singh
As recorded by the court registry
4 orders share this CNR
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
