Naushad Ali v. State of U.P. and Anr.
Case brief
What is this about?
Application for anticipatory bail rendered infructuous due to non-appearance of the applicant, resulting in dismissal of the petition by the Allahabad High Court Lucknow Bench.
Application for anticipatory bail rendered infructuous due to non-appearance of the applicant, resulting in dismissal of the petition by the Allahabad High Court Lucknow Bench.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
Neutral Citation No. - 2024:AHC-LKO:37402
Court No. - 12
Case :- CRIMINAL MISC ANTICIPATORY BAIL APPLICATION U/S 438 CR.P.C. No. - 146 of 2021
Applicant :- Naushad Ali Opposite Party :- State Of U.P. And Anr. Counsel for Applicant :- Sajjad Husain Counsel for Opposite Party :- G.A.,Bhupendra Pratap Singh,Kulsoom Firoz
Hon'ble Pankaj Bhatia,J.
Case called out. None is present on behalf of the applicant.
The applicant was never enlarged on anticipatory bail.
It is informed that charge sheet has already been filed.
As none appears on behalf of the applicant, this anticipatory bail applicant has rendered infructuous and it is, accordingly, dismissed.
Order Date :- 15.5.2024 Anuj Singh
Digitally signed by :- ANUJ PRATAP SINGH High Court of Judicature at Allahabad, Lucknow Bench
Naushad Ali
State Of U.P.
Pankaj Bhatia
Anuj Pratap Singh
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court