Intzar v. State of U.P. and Anr.
Case brief
What is this about?
The single-judge High Court bench dismissed the bail application held infructuous as the applicant had already been convicted and sentenced in the Sessions Trial.
What did the court decide?
Bail application dismissed as infructuous.
What the court decided
Neutral Citation No. - 2024:AHC-LKO:50144
Court No. - 14 Case :- CRIMINAL MISC. BAIL APPLICATION No. - 1455 of 2021
Applicant :- Intzar Opposite Party :- State Of U.P. And Anr. Counsel for Applicant :- Mohammad Aziz Mansuri,Bhoopal Singh,Priyanka Yadav,Rahul Tripathi,Waqar Ahmad,Zeba Wasi Counsel for Opposite Party :- G.A.
Hon'ble Karunesh Singh Pawar,J.
Case called out. None appears on behalf of the applicant.
Shri Arun Kumar Pandey, learned AGA on the basis of instructions has submitted that the applicant has been convicted by the learned District and Sessions Judge, Shrawasti vide its judgment and order dated 15.11.2022 passed in Sessions Trial No. 55/2021 "State Vs. Intezar".
In view of the submission made by the learned AGA, the bail application is dismissed having become infructuous.
Order Date :- 24.7.2024 R.C.
Digitally signed by :- RAM CHANDER YADAV High Court of Judicature at Allahabad, Lucknow Bench
Issues for consideration
1 issue framed by the court
Whether a bail application should be allowed when the convict has been sentenced below.
Parties & counsel
- applicant
Intzar
Coram
Karunesh Singh Pawar
Case details
As recorded by the court registry
- Court
- Allahabad HC
- Decided on
- · July
- Registered
- Case no.
- /1455/2021
Similar cases
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court