Court heard an application where counsel submitted that the impugned order dated 25.11.2022 was complied with. The court found no contempt made out and discharged the notices. The contempt petition was dismissed with no further orders.
Contempt notices discharged and contempt petition dismissed.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
Neutral Citation No. - 2024:AHC-LKO:23044
Court No. - 19
Case :- CONTEMPT APPLICATION (CIVIL) No. - 1318 of 2023
Applicant :- Anil Kumar Opposite Party :- Dr. Vineeta, District Basic Education Officer, Hardoi And Another Counsel for Applicant :- Amit Kumar Awasthi
Hon'ble Shree Prakash Singh,J.
Sri Prashant Kumar Singh, learned counsel for the District Basic Education Officer, Hardoi is present.
Ms. Manavi Pandey, Advocate, holding brief of Sri Amit Kumar Awasthi, learned counsel for the applicant submits that the order dated 25.11.2022 passed by the writ Court in Writ-A No.7950 of 2022 has been complied with.
In view of the aforesaid statement, no contempt is made out.
Contempt notices are discharged and contempt petition is dismissed .
Consigned to the records.
Order Date :- 15.3.2024 Ram Murti
Digitally signed by :- RAM MURTI YADAV High Court of Judicature at Allahabad, Lucknow Bench
1 issue framed by the court
Whether the order dated 25.11.2022 passed by the writ Court has been complied with to prevent finding of contempt.
Anil Kumar
Dr. Vineeta
District Basic Education Officer, Hardoi And Another
Prakash Singh
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
