Uma Shanker Lodhi v. State of U.P. Thru. Addl. Chief Secy. Deptt. Home Civil Sectt. Lko.
Case brief
What is this about?
Bail allowed — second bail application; offences under Sections 364, 302 and 201/34 IPC (abduction, murder, disappearance of evidence); circumstantial/last-seen evidence; applicant in custody since 14.4.2020; delay in trial due to prosecution and I.O. non-cooperation (summons, bailable warrant, notice under S. 350 Cr.P.C.); parity with co-accused Munni Lal Pasi (bailed 28.2.2024); reliance on Javed Gulam Nabi Shaikh v. State of Maharashtra, 2024 SCC OnLine SC 1693; bail conditions incl. S. 229-A IPC, S. 82 Cr.P.C., S. 174-A IPC; Case Crime No. 116 of 2020, P.S. Purwa, District Unnao; Allahabad High Court, Lucknow Bench; Karunesh Singh Pawar, J.; order dated 24.9.2024.
What did the court decide?
Bail granted. The applicant is to be released on furnishing a personal bond and two sureties each in the like amount to the satisfaction of the court concerned, subject to conditions: (i) not tampering with evidence during trial; (ii) not pressurising/intimidating prosecution witnesses; (iii) no inducement, threat or promise to dissuade any person from disclosing facts; (iv) an undertaking not to seek adjournments on dates fixed for evidence when witnesses are present, default being treated as abuse of liberty of bail; (v) remaining present before the trial court on each date fixed, failing which proceedings may lie under Section 229-A IPC; and (vi) in case of misuse of bail liberty and failure to appear after proclamation under Section 82 Cr.P.C., proceedings under Section 174-A IPC.