The Allahabad High Court rejected the anticipatory bail application of Varun Dixit in a case involving alleged violence in a road dispute. The court denied relief citing victim injuries and the accused failing to appear in a CCTV record.
None; applicant directed to file bail application before sessions court.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
Neutral Citation No. - 2024:AHC-LKO:42632
Court No. - 11
Case :- CRIMINAL MISC ANTICIPATORY BAIL APPLICATION U/S 438 CR.P.C. No. - 1305 of 2024
Applicant :- Varun Dixit Opposite Party :- State Of U.P. Thru. Prin. Secy. Home Deptt. Lko
Counsel for Applicant :- Sudhir Kumar Srivastava,Pal Singh Yadav
Counsel for Opposite Party :- G.A.
Hon'ble Subhash Vidyarthi,J.
[ Subhash Vidyarthi,J.]
Order Date :- 6.6.2024 Anupam S/-
Digitally signed by :- ANUPAM SINGH PATEL High Court of Judicature at Allahabad, Lucknow Bench
1 issue framed by the court
Whether anticipatory bail should be granted to the applicant under Section 438 Cr.P.C. in a case alleging causing hurt, criminal intimidation, and attempt to murder due to a road dispute.
Colour shows how this judgement treated each authority
Satender Kumar Antil v. C.B.I.Referred¶17
Satender Kumar Antil v. C.B.I., (2021) 10 SCC 773 · Who else cites this
1 provisions across 1 enactments
Varun Dixit
State Of U.P. Thru. Prin. Secy. Home Deptt. Lko
Subhash Vidyarthi
As recorded by the court registry
2 orders share this CNR
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
