Allowed¶10

Deepak v. State of U.P. Thru. Prin. Secy. Home Deptt. Civil Sectt. Lko.

Allahabad HC6 Feb 2024/1187/2024

Case brief

AI extract

What is this about?

Allahabad High Court, Lucknow Bench — Criminal Misc. Bail Application No. 1187 of 2024 (Deepak v. State of U.P.), decided 6.2.2024 by Pankaj Bhatia, J. Bail allowed under Section 2/3 of the U.P. Gangsters and Anti-Social Activities (Prevention) Act, 1986 in FIR No. 273 of 2022, Police Station Sarojini Nagar, District Lucknow. Ground: applicant already on bail in all four gang-chart cases; custody since 12.01.2024. Release ordered on personal bond with two sureties of Rs. 20,000/- each, with standard anti-tampering and attendance conditions.

What did the court decide?

Applicant Deepak to be released on bail in FIR No. 273 of 2022 on furnishing a personal bond with two sureties of Rs. 20,000/- each, subject to conditions (a), (b) and (c) stated in the order. ¶10

Deepak Vs State of U.P. Thru. Prin. Secy. Home Deptt. Civil Sectt. Lko. — Allahabad HC (2024) — LawSathi Research

¶1

Neutral Citation No. - 2024:AHC-LKO:10690

¶2

Court No. - 12

¶3

Case :- CRIMINAL MISC. BAIL APPLICATION No. - 1187 of 2024

¶4

Applicant :- Deepak Opposite Party :- State Of U.P. Thru. Prin. Secy. Home Deptt. Civil Sectt. Lko. Counsel for Applicant :- Kaushal Kishore Tewari Counsel for Opposite Party :- G.A.

¶5

Hon'ble Pankaj Bhatia,J.

¶6

1. Heard learned Counsel for the applicant as well as learned A.G.A. and perused the record.

¶7

2. The applicant seeks enlargement on bail in FIR No.273 of 2022, under Section 2/3 of the U.P. Gangsters and Anti-Social Activities (Prevention) Act, 1986 registered at Police Station Sarojini Nagar, District Lucknow.

¶8

3 . Submission of Counsel for the applicant is that the applicant is on bail in all four cases shown in the gang chart. The copies of the bail orders are on record. Other than that, the applicant has been implicated in other cases and in all the said cases, the applicant is said to be on bail. The applicant is in custody since 12.01.2024.

¶9

4. Per contra, learned A.G.A. has opposed the bail prayer of the applicant.

¶10

5. Considering the submissions made by learned counsel for the parties and and keeping in view the fact that the applicant has already been enlarged on bail in the cases shown in the gang chart, I am of view that the applicant is entitled for bail. Thus, the present application is allowed .

¶11

6. Let the applicant Deepak be released on bail in the aforesaid first information report on his furnishing a personal bond with two sureties of Rs.20,000/- each to the satisfaction of court concerned with the following conditions:

¶12

(a) The applicant shall execute a bond to undertake to attend the hearings;

¶13

(b) The applicant shall not commit any offence similar to the offence of which he is accused or suspected of the commission; and

¶14

(c) The applicant shall not directly or indirectly make any inducement, threat or promise to any person acquainted with the facts of the case so as to dissuade him from disclosing such facts to the Court or to any police officer or tamper with the evidence.

¶15

Order Date :- 6.2.2024 akverma

¶16

Digitally signed by :- ASHOK KUMAR VERMA High Court of Judicature at Allahabad, Lucknow Bench

Deepak v. State of U.P. Thru. Prin. Secy. Home Deptt. Civil Sectt. Lko.

Case brief

What is this about?

What did the court decide?

Deepak v. State of U.P. Thru. Prin. Secy. Home Deptt. Civil Sectt. Lko.

Case brief

What is this about?

What did the court decide?

Why is it important?

What the court decided

Issues for consideration

Statutes considered

Procedural history

Parties & counsel

Coram

Case details

All orders in this case

Similar cases

Jabir Vs State of U.P. Thru. Prin. Secy. Home Lko.

Bramha Vs State of U.P. Thru. Its Prin. Secy. Home Deptt. Civil Sectt. Lko.

Sewak Ram Vs State of U.P. Thru. Prin. Secy., Home Deptt., Lucknow and Others

Atul Rai Alias Atul Vs State of U.P. Thru. Prin. Secy. Home Deptt. Lko.

Vikas Mishra Vs State of U.P. Thru. Prin. Secy. Home Lko.

Brijesh Kumar Saroj @ Chakle Vs State of U.P. Thru. Secy. Home Lko.