persons for causing injuries without making any specific allegation against any accused person for causing any injury to any injured person, as alleged in the proseuction story and as per the medical examination report three police personnel sustained single injuries on their body, which falsify the prosecution story; and considering that similarly situated some of the accused, namely, Dhanraj Pratap Singh, Dhirendra Singh, Shubham Singh, Kulwant Singh and Aakash Nigam have already been granted bail by the trial Court in Bail Application No. 431/2024 arising out of Case Crime No. 56/2024, under Sections 188, 143, 504, 506, 186, 332, 307 I.P.C. and Section 3 (1) (da), 3(1) (dha), 3 (2) (v) S.C./S.T. Act and Section 7 Criminal Law Amendment Act, Police Station Kotwali Nagar, District Barabanki and the case of the appellant is not on the worst footing than that of the other co-accused, who have been already granted bail by the trial Court; further considering the larger mandate of the Article 21 of the Constitution of India and the law laid down by the Hon'ble Apex Court in the case of Dataram Singh vs. State of UP and another, reported in (2018) 3 SCC 22 this Court is of the view that the learned trial court has failed to appreciate the material available on record. The order passed by the trial court is liable to be set aside.
