Disposed¶11
Dileep Kumar Srivastava v. State of U.P. Thru. Prin. Secy. Social Welfare Deptt. Lko. and Another
Allahabad HC/11272/2024
Case brief
AI extract
What is this about?
Second and third ACP benefits; Assured Career Progression; eligibility for financial upgradation; time-bound direction to decide representation by reasoned and speaking order; respondent No.2, Social Welfare Department, Government of U.P.; writ petition disposed of with consent without deciding merits; no adjudication on entitlement; Allahabad High Court Lucknow Bench; Abdul Moin, J.; 27.11.2024; 2024:AHC-LKO:78746.
What did the court decide?
Liberty/direction to the petitioner to submit a representation before respondent No.2 within two weeks; respondent No.2 to decide it by a reasoned and speaking order within eight weeks of receipt of a certified copy of the order along with the representation. No adjudication on merits. ¶11