The court dismissed an anticipatory bail application as infructuous because the applicant was already in custody, as submitted by the Prosecution.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
Neutral Citation No. - 2024:AHC-LKO:66825
Court No. - 14
Case :- CRIMINAL MISC ANTICIPATORY BAIL APPLICATION U/S 438 CR.P.C. No. - 112 of 2023
Applicant :- Vijay Kumar Yadav @ Vijay Yadav Opposite Party :- State Of U.P. Thru. Secy. Home Deptt. Lko. Counsel for Applicant :- Apoorva Jyoti,Aman Shankar,Avinash Chowdhary,Nalin Arora,Neeraj Kumar Rawat Counsel for Opposite Party :- G.A.,Satya Prakash Mishra
Hon'ble Karunesh Singh Pawar,J.
Case called out.
None appears for the applicant however, learned A.G.A. for the State-respondent is present.
Learned A.G.A. on the basis of written instructions submits that applicant has been arrested.
In view of above, the application is dismissed as having become infructuous.
Order Date :- 26.9.2024 Saurabh Yadav/-
Digitally signed by :- SAURABH YADAV High Court of Judicature at Allahabad, Lucknow Bench
Vijay Kumar Yadav
State Of U.P.
Karunesh Singh Pawar
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
