Chetan Bahel v. State of U.P. Thru. Addl. Chief Secy. Home Lko and Another
Case brief
What is this about?
Quashing application u/S 482 (482 kha); charge-sheet no. 2033 of 2020 (State vs. Chetan Behal); Sections 498-A, 323, 504, 506 I.P.C.; 3/4 of D.P. Act; Police Station Mahanagar, District Lucknow; amicable compromise between parties; verification of compromise by trial court in presence of signatories; notices to compromise signatories; report on verified compromise; certified copy; liberty to file fresh quashing application; one-month protection from coercive action; return of original compromise deed; Rajeev Singh, J.; Allahabad High Court, Lucknow Bench, Court No. 13; order date 22.11.2024; neutral citation 2024:AHC-LKO:77855; applicant Chetan Bahel; counsel Manish Pandey (applicant), G.A. (State), Pankaj Kumar (opposite party no.2).
What did the court decide?
Application disposed of with directions to the trial court: if the compromise is filed before it, issue notices to all signatories requiring personal presence and verify the compromise; if verified, prepare a report and make the compromise part of the record; allow parties certified copies of the report and compromise; liberty reserved to the applicant to approach this Court again for quashing; no coercive action against the applicant for one month; Office to return the original compromise deed to counsel for the applicant after photocopy.