The writ petition was dismissed as infructuous because a subsequent F.I.R. under Section 363 IPC had been lodged, making the matter no longer arguable.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
Court No. - 90
Case :- WRIT - C No. - 9817 of 2023
Petitioner :- Asha And Another Respondent :- State Of U.P. And 4 Others Counsel for Petitioner :- Rajesh Mani Tripathi Counsel for Respondent :- C.S.C.
Hon'ble Syed Aftab Husain Rizvi,J.
List revised. None is present for the petitioners. However, Sri Ajai Kumar, State Law Officer, appearing for respondent nos. 1 and 2 is present and states that in this matter F.I.R. vide Case Crime No.150 of 2023 under Section 363 I.P.C., Police Station Bansgaon, District Gorakhpur has been lodged, therefore, this petition has become infructuous.
Accordingly, this writ petition is dismissed as having become infructuous.
Order Date :- 11.5.2023 MN/-
Digitally signed by :- MAHENDRA NATH High Court of Judicature at Allahabad
Asha And Another
State Of U.P.
4 Others
Syed Aftab Husain Rizvi
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
