Writ petition dismissed at the initial stage as the petitioner's counsel indicated that all requested documents had been or would be supplied, leaving no ground to sustain the petition.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
Neutral Citation No. - 2023:AHC:97967-DB
Chief Justice's Court
Case :- WRIT - C No. - 9424 of 2023
Petitioner :- Arvind Lal Respondent :- State Of U.P. And 3 Others Counsel for Petitioner :- Pradeep Kumar,Dinesh Yadav,Mahesh Kumar Yadav Counsel for Respondent :- CSC,Anand Prakash Paul
Hon'ble Pritinker Diwaker,Chief Justice Hon'ble Saumitra Dayal Singh,J.
Sri Pradeep Kumar, learned counsel for the petitioner, learned standing counsel for the State-respondents and Sri A.P. Paul, learned counsel for Development Authority, respondent no. 2.
Learned counsel for Development Authority submits that all the relevant documents, as mentioned in the writ petition have, already been supplied to the petitioner. He further submits, in any case such documents would also be supplied to the petitioner within one week, at his address disclosed in this petition.
In view of above statement made by learned counsel for the petitioner, nothing survives in the writ petition and the same is accordingly disposed of at this stage.
Order Date :- 8.5.2023 SK
(S.D. Singh,J.) (Pritinker Diwaker,CJ.)
Digitally signed by :- SANDEEP KUMAR High Court of Judicature at Allahabad
Arvind Lal
State Of U.P.
Pritinker Diwaker
Saumitra Dayal Singh
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
