Disposed

Babu Nandan v. State of U.P. and 25 Others

Allahabad HC13 Apr 2023WRIC/9091/2023

Case brief

AI extract

What is this about?

The court dismissed a writ petition seeking a directive for the expeditious disposal of a pending civil appeal concerning land reforms, issuing an order to the Additional Commissioner to complete proceedings within six months.

What did the court decide?

Direction to the Additional Commissioner to conclude the proceedings of Civil Appeal No.212 of 2023 expeditiously within six months.

Babu Nandan Vs State of U.P. and 25 Others — Property and Title | Allahabad HC (2023)

¶1

Court No. - 52

¶2

Case :- WRIT - C No. - 9091 of 2023

¶3

Petitioner :- Babu Nandan Respondent :- State Of U.P. And 25 Others Counsel for Petitioner :- Jagdish Singh Counsel for Respondent :- C.S.C,Nitesh Kumar Srivastava

¶4

Hon'ble Kshitij Shailendra,J.

¶5

Heard Shri Jagdish Singh, learned counsel for the petitioner, learned Standing Counsel representing the State-respondents and Shri Nitesh Kumar Srivastava, learned counsel for the respondent No.11.

¶6

This writ petition has been filed seeking expeditious disposal of Civil Appeal No.212 of 2023 (Computerized Case No.C-202305000000212) (Babu Nandan v. Raj Kishor & Ors.) under Section 331(3) of the U.P. Zamindari Abolition and Land Reforms Act-1950 within stipulated period.

¶7

Learned counsel for the petitioner submits that pendency of the aforesaid case is causing serious prejudice to the rights of the petitioner and therefore this Court should issue a direction for expeditious disposal of the case.

¶8

Learned Standing Counsel has no serious objection to the prayer made by the learned counsel for the petitioner.

¶9

In view of the above, having heard the learned counsel for the parties and having perused the record, this petition is disposed off with a direction to the respondent no.2-Additional Commissioner (Administration) III, Gorakhpur, Division-Gorakhpur to conclude the proceedings of the aforesaid case expeditiously, preferably, within a period of six months from the date a certified copy of this order is produced before him, after giving full opportunity of hearing to the parties concerned.

¶10

In case, the lawyers do not cooperate with the proceedings either on account of abstainment from work or otherwise, the court concerned shall permit personal appearance of the parties to address it on the merits of the aforesaid case. However, the authority/court concerned shall take special care of the fact that the property rights of the parties may not be adversely affected only on account of non-cooperation of the lawyers and the aforesaid matter shall be disposed of strictly in accordance with law, taking care of the statutory provisions and after making critical analysis of the material available on record.

¶11

Order Date :- 13.4.2023 Jyotsana

¶12

Digitally signed by :- JYOTSANA SINGH High Court of Judicature at Allahabad

Babu Nandan v. State of U.P. and 25 Others

Case brief

What is this about?

What did the court decide?

Babu Nandan v. State of U.P. and 25 Others

Case brief

What is this about?

What did the court decide?

What the court decided

A compact analysis

Issues for consideration

Statutes considered

Parties & counsel

Coram

Case details

Similar cases

Smt. Malti Devi Vs State of U.P. and 6 Others

Ramdas and 11 Others Vs State of U.P. and 8 Others

Pratap Singh Vs State of U.P. and 3 Others

Smt. Jaitunnisha Vs State of U.P. and Another

Hira Yadav Vs State of U.P. and 6 Others

Babu Ram Vs State of U.P. and 2 Others