Disposed

Dadhibal v. State of U.P. and 6 Others

Allahabad HC23 Mar 2023WRIC/7294/2023

Case brief

AI extract

What is this about?

Petitioner sought expedited disposal of a pending revision case. Court directed the Additional Commissioner to conclude proceedings within four months, permitting personal appearance if lawyers desert the case to protect property rights.

What did the court decide?

Direction to Additional Commissioner, District Deoria, to conclude proceedings of the pending case within four months.

Dadhibal Vs State of U.P. and 6 Others — Civil Procedure and Limitation | Allahabad HC (2023)

¶1

Court No. - 52

¶2

Case :- WRIT - C No. - 7294 of 2023

¶3

Petitioner :- Dadhibal Respondent :- State Of U.P. And 6 Others Counsel for Petitioner :- Chhote Lal Bhartiya Counsel for Respondent :- C.S.C.

¶4

Hon'ble Kshitij Shailendra,J.

¶5

Heard Sri Chhote Lal Bhartiya, learned counsel for the petitioner and learned Standing Counsel representing the State-respondents.

¶6

This petition has been filed seeking expeditious disposal of Revision No. RST/944/582 of 2007-2008 (Computerized Case No. C200805000065) (Dadhibal Vs. Rajkumar and others) within a stipulated period.

¶7

Learned counsel for the petitioner submits that pendency of the aforesaid case is causing serious prejudice to the rights of the petitioner and therefore this Court should issue a direction for expeditious disposal of the case.

¶8

Learned Standing Counsel has no serious objection to the prayer made by the learned counsel for the petitioner.

¶9

In view of the above, having heard the learned counsel for the parties and having perused the record, this petition is disposed of with a direction to the Additional Commissioner (Administration) 3rd, Mandal Gorakhpur, District Deoria (respondent no.2) to conclude the proceedings of the aforesaid case expeditiously, preferably, within a period of four months from the date a certified copy of this order is produced before him, after giving full opportunity of hearing to the parties concerned.

¶10

In case the lawyers do not cooperate with the proceedings either on account of abstainment from work or otherwise, the court concerned shall permit personal appearance of the parties to address it on the merits of the aforesaid case. However, the authority/court concerned shall take special care of the fact that the property rights of the parties may not be adversely affected only on account of non-cooperation of the lawyers and the aforesaid matter shall be disposed of strictly in accordance with law, taking care of the statutory provisions and after making critical analysis of the material available on record.

¶11

Order Date :- 23.3.2023 AKShukla/-

¶12

Digitally signed by :- ANIL KUMAR SHUKLA High Court of Judicature at Allahabad

Dadhibal v. State of U.P. and 6 Others

Case brief

What is this about?

What did the court decide?

Dadhibal v. State of U.P. and 6 Others

Case brief

What is this about?

What did the court decide?

What the court decided

A compact analysis

Issues for consideration

Parties & counsel

Coram

Case details

Similar cases

Vivek Prem Kumar Gupta and Another Vs State of U.P. and 4 Others

Gulabi Devi Vs State of U.P. and 16 Others

Brijlal and 2 Others Vs State of U.P. and 3 Others

Sudha Vishwavindu and Another Vs State of U.P. and 15 Others

Baj Singh and 6 Others Vs State of U.P. and 2 Others

Karimuddin Vs State of U.P. and 4 Others