Disposed

Laichi Devi v. State of U.P. and 2 Others

Allahabad HC19 Apr 2023WRIC/6771/2023

Case brief

AI extract

What is this about?

In a writ petition, the Hon'ble High Court of Judicature at Allahabad directed the Additional Tehsildar to conclude the pending revenue case expeditiously within six months, emphasizing strict adherence to law and personal appearance if lawyers fail to cooperate.

What did the court decide?

Direction to conclude proceedings expeditiously within six months and permit personal appearance if lawyers do not cooperate.

Laichi Devi Vs State of U.P. and 2 Others — Service and Employment | Allahabad HC (2023)

¶1

Court No. - 52

¶2

Case :- WRIT - C No. - 6771 of 2023

¶3

Petitioner :- Laichi Devi Respondent :- State Of U.P. And 2 Others Counsel for Petitioner :- Pramod Kumar Maurya Counsel for Respondent :- C.S.C.

¶4

Hon'ble Kshitij Shailendra,J.

¶5

Supplementary affidavit filed today is taken on record.

¶6

Heard learned counsel for the petitioner and learned Standing Counsel representing the State-respondents.

¶7

This petition has been filed seeking expeditious disposal of Case No. RST 907/309/2013-2014 (Computerized Case No. T201305471204) (Laichi Devi vs Sonmati Devi), under section 34/35 of U.P. Revenue Code, 2006 pending before the respondent No. 2, Additional Tehsildar, Sadar, Maharajganj.

¶8

Learned counsel for the petitioner submits that pendency of the aforesaid case is causing serious prejudice to the rights of the petitioner and therefore this Court should issue a direction for expeditious disposal of the case.

¶9

Learned Standing Counsel has no serious objection to the prayer made by the learned counsel for the petitioner.

¶10

In view of the above, having heard the learned counsel for the parties and having perused the record, this petition is disposed of with a direction to respondent No. 2 to conclude the proceedings of the aforesaid case expeditiously, preferably, within a period of six months from the date a certified copy of this order is produced before him.

¶11

In case the lawyers do not cooperate with the proceedings either on account of abstainment from work or otherwise, the court concerned shall permit personal appearance of the parties to address it on the merits of the aforesaid case. However, the authority/court concerned shall take special care of the fact that the property rights of the parties may not be adversely affected only on account of non-cooperation of the lawyers and the aforesaid matter shall be disposed of strictly in accordance with law, taking care of the statutory provisions and after making critical analysis of the

¶12

material available on record.

¶13

Order Date :- 19.4.2023 Sazia

¶14

Digitally signed by :- SAZIA AQUIL High Court of Judicature at Allahabad

Laichi Devi v. State of U.P. and 2 Others

Case brief

What is this about?

What did the court decide?

Laichi Devi v. State of U.P. and 2 Others

Case brief

What is this about?

What did the court decide?

What the court decided

A compact analysis

Parties & counsel

Coram

Case details

Similar cases

Udai Bhan and 4 Others Vs State of U.P. and 3 Others

Smt. Sanju Devi Vs State of U.P. and Another

Shiv Kumar Vs State of U.P. and 13 Others

Rohit Kumar Vs State of U.P. and 5 Others

Ram Pyare Vs State of U.P. and 5 Others

Hakik Ahmad Vs State of U.P. and 4 Others