The High Court held that the present petition seeking quashing of an election order and calling for fresh elections became infructuous due to a subsequent order passed in a leading petition (Writ C No. 11678 of 2023). The petition was accordingly dismissed.
petition dismissed as infructuous; any interim order stands vacated
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
Neutral Citation No. - 2023:AHC:171831
Court No. - 4
Case :- WRIT - C No. - 66291 of 2014
Petitioner :- Yogendra Singh Respondent :- State Of U.P. And 4 Others Counsel for Petitioner :- V.K. Singh,D.K. Singh Counsel for Respondent :- C.S.C.,Ajit Kumar Singh
Hon'ble Prakash Padia,J.
"i. to issue a writ, order or direction in the nature of certiorari quashing the impugned order dated 03.11.2014 passed by the Vice Chancellor Mahatma Gandhi Kashi Vidyapeeth Varanasi (Annexure-18 to the writ petition).
ii. to issue a writ, order or direction in the nature of mandamus commanding the respondent-authorities to get fresh elections held under the supervision and control of an independant officer, preferably the District Magistrate Ballia, who was continuing as the Administrator."
Order Date :- 25.8.2023 Swati
Digitally signed by :- SWATI PATHAK High Court of Judicature at Allahabad
Colour shows how this judgement treated each authority
Shri Sudhishta Baba Sikshan Pratishthan and Another vs. State of U.P. and 3 othersReferred¶10
Writ C No. 11678 of 2023
Yogendra Singh
State Of U.P.
Prakash Padia
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
