Disposed
Smt. Rama Devi v. State of U.P. and 2 Others
Allahabad HCWRIC/5207/2023
Case brief
from the order text
What is this about?
Case :- WRIT - C No. - 5207 of 2023…
What the court decided
AI extract
Case :- WRIT - C No. - 5207 of 2023…
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
Court No. - 52
Case :- WRIT - C No. - 5207 of 2023
Petitioner :- Smt. Rama Devi Respondent :- State Of U.P. And 2 Others Counsel for Petitioner :- Dilendra Pratap Singh Counsel for Respondent :- CSC
Hon'ble Kshitij Shailendra,J.
Supplementary affidavit filed today pursuant to the previous order of this Court is taken on record.
Heard Shri Dilendra Pratap Singh, learned counsel for the petitioner and learned Standing Counsel representing the Staterespondents.
This petition has been filed seeking expeditious disposal of Case No. T-201805310707372, under section 207 of U.P. Revenue Code, 2006 pending before respondent No. 2, Up Ziladhikari, Tehsil Gola, district Gorakhpur.
Learned counsel for the petitioner submits that pendency of the aforesaid case is causing serious prejudice to the rights of the petitioner and therefore this Court should issue a direction for expeditious disposal of the case.
Learned Standing Counsel has no serious objection to the prayer made by the learned counsel for the petitioner.
In view of the above, having heard the learned counsel for the parties and having perused the record, this petition is disposed of with a direction to respondent No.2 to conclude the proceedings of the aforesaid case expeditiously, preferably, within a period of four months from the date a certified copy of this order is produced before him.
In case the lawyers do not cooperate with the proceedings either on account of abstainment from work or otherwise, the court concerned shall permit personal appearance of the parties to address it on the merits of the aforesaid case. However, the authority/court concerned shall take special care of the fact that the property rights of the parties may not be adversely affected only on account of non-cooperation of the lawyers and the aforesaid matter shall be disposed of strictly in accordance with law, taking care of
the statutory provisions and after making critical analysis of the material available on record.
Order Date :- 17.3.2023 Sazia
Digitally signed by :- SAZIA AQUIL High Court of Judicature at Allahabad
Smt. Rama Devi
State Of U.P.
Up Ziladhikari
2 Others
Kshitij Shailendra
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court