The High Court dismissed the writ petition challenging an auction notice dated 10.01.2003 as infructuous due to the passage of more than twenty years, noting the petitioner did not appear. It was a single-line notice calling but dismissing by lapse of time.
The writ petition was dismissed as infructuous by passage of time.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
Neutral Citation No. - 2023:AHC:110505-DB
Court No. - 3
Case :- WRIT - C No. - 4305 of 2003
Petitioner :- Siddha Gopal Yadav Respondent :- District Officer/Collector Hamirpur Counsel for Petitioner :- Ashok Mehta Counsel for Respondent :- C.S.C.
Hon'ble Surya Prakash Kesarwani,J. Hon'ble Anish Kumar Gupta,J.
Order Date :- 19.5.2023 Ankit.
Digitally signed by :- ANKIT VISHWAKARMA High Court of Judicature at Allahabad
1 issue framed by the court
Whether the writ petition challenging the auction notice of minor minerals dated 10.01.2003 can be allowed after more than twenty years.
Siddha Gopal Yadav
District Officer/Collector Hamirpur
Surya Prakash Kesarwani
Anish Kumar Gupta
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
