The writ petition was dismissed due to the petitioner's counsel stating there were no instructions filed by the petitioner.
Petitioner has no instructions; writ petition dismissed.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
Court No. - 40
Case :- WRIT - C No. - 40992 of 2018
Petitioner :- Babar Hasan And 2 Others Respondent :- State Of U P And 2 Others Counsel for Petitioner :- Madhusudan Dikshit Counsel for Respondent :- C.S.C.
Hon'ble Mahesh Chandra Tripathi,J. Hon'ble Manjive Shukla,J.
Learned counsel for the petitioner states that he has no instructions in the matter.
Accordingly, the writ petition is dismissed for want of instructions.
Ms. Uttara Bahuguna, learned Additional Chief Standing Counsel for the State is present.
Order Date :- 12.4.2023 Salim
Digitally signed by :- SALIM PRAVEJ High Court of Judicature at Allahabad
Babar Hasan And 2 Others
State Of U P And 2 Others
Mahesh Chandra Tripathi
Manjive Shukla
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
