Disposed

Ajeet and 4 Others v. State of U P and 14 Others

Allahabad HC22 Feb 2023WRIC/40519/2022

Case brief

AI extract

What is this about?

This writ petition sought a direction for the expeditious disposal of a pending revision case under Section 333 of the U.P. Zamindari Abolition and Land Reforms Act, 1950. The Court directed the Additional Commissioner (Judicial) to conclude proceedings within four months and addressed potential delays due to lawyer non-cooperation while protecting the parties' property rights.

What did the court decide?

Direction to conclude proceedings of Revision/Case No.190 of 2014 expeditiously within four months.

Ajeet and 4 Others Vs State of U P and 14 Others — Property and Title | Allahabad HC (2023)

¶1

Court No. - 43

¶2

Case :- WRIT - C No. - 40519 of 2022

¶3

Petitioner :- Ajeet And 4 Others Respondent :- State Of U P And 14 Others Counsel for Petitioner :- Manoj Yadav Counsel for Respondent :- C.S.C.,Rameshwar Prasad Shukla

¶4

Hon'ble Kshitij Shailendra,J.

¶5

Heard Shri Manoj Yadav, learned counsel for the petitioner and Shri Sanjeev Pandey, learned Standing Counsel representing the State-respondents. Shri Rameshwar Prasad Shukla, learned counsel has accepted notice on behalf of respondent no.3-Gaon Sabha.

¶6

This writ petition has been filed seeking expeditious disposal of Revision/Case No.190 of 2014 (Computerized Case No. C- 2014150000190) (Ajeet & Ors. v. Sanjay & Ors.), under Section 333 of the U.P. Zamindari Abolition and Land Reforms Act-1950 within stipulated period.

¶7

Learned counsel for the petitioner submits that pendency of the aforesaid case is causing serious prejudice to the rights of the petitioner and, therefore, this Court should issue a direction for expeditious disposal of the case.

¶8

Learned Standing Counsel has no serious objection to the prayer made by the learned counsel for the petitioner.

¶9

In view of the above, having heard the learned counsel for the parties and having perused the record, this petition is disposed of with a direction to the respondent no.2-Additional Commissioner (Judicial) Azamgarh, Division-Azamgarh to conclude the proceedings of the aforesaid case expeditiously, preferably, within a period of four months from the date a certified copy of this order is produced before him, after giving full opportunity of hearing to the parties concerned.

¶10

In case, the lawyers do not cooperate with the proceedings either on account of abstainment from work or otherwise, the court concerned shall permit personal appearance of the parties to address it on the merits of the aforesaid case. However, the authority/court concerned shall take special care of the fact that the property rights of the parties may not be adversely affected only on account of non-cooperation of the lawyers and the aforesaid matter shall be disposed of strictly in accordance with law, taking care of the statutory provisions and after making

¶11

critical analysis of the material available on record. Order Date :- 22.2.2023 Jyotsana

¶12

Digitally signed by :- JYOTSANA SINGH High Court of Judicature at Allahabad

Ajeet and 4 Others v. State of U P and 14 Others

Case brief

What is this about?

What did the court decide?

Ajeet and 4 Others v. State of U P and 14 Others

Case brief

What is this about?

What did the court decide?

What the court decided

A compact analysis

Issues for consideration

Statutes considered

Parties & counsel

Coram

Case details

Similar cases

Tribhwan Tiwari Vs State of U.P. and 3 Others

Thakurdin and Another Vs State of U.P. and 3 Others

Isharawati and 2 Others Vs State of U.P. and 4 Others

Shyamnarayan Singh Vs State of U.P. and 3 Others

Jagdish Narayan Rai Vs State of U.P. and 3 Others

Vinay Dev Narayan Dubey Vs Commissioner, Varanasi Division and 58 Others