A writ petition filed by Kiranwati and others was dismissed for want of prosecution as no one appeared on behalf of the petitioners to press the matter despite the presence of the Standing Counsel for the respondent. Any interim order was vacated.
Writ petition dismissed; interim order if any, vacated.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
Court No. - 52
Case :- WRIT - C No. - 40477 of 2022
Petitioner :- Kiranwati And Other Respondent :- State Of U.P. And 3 Others Counsel for Petitioner :- Divyanshu Nandan Tripathi,Chandranshu Gour Counsel for Respondent :- C.S.C.
Hon'ble Saurabh Srivastava,J.
Order Date :- 30.11.2023 Vivek Kr.
Digitally signed by :- VIVEK KUMAR High Court of Judicature at Allahabad
Kiranwati And Other
State Of U.P. And 3 Others
Saurabh Srivastava
Vivek Kumar
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
