Sayed Ahmed Shaheed v. Union of India and 3 Others
Case brief
What is this about?
The petition was dismissed as infructuous due to prior admission of the petitioner.
What did the court decide?
Writ petition dismissed as infructuous.
The petition was dismissed as infructuous due to prior admission of the petitioner.
Writ petition dismissed as infructuous.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
Court No. - 9
Case :- WRIT - C No. - 38979 of 2022
Petitioner :- Sayed Ahmed Shaheed Respondent :- Union Of India And 3 Others Counsel for Petitioner :- Mohammad Danish Counsel for Respondent :- A.S.G.I.,Mukteshwar Upadhyay,Shashank Shekhar Singh
Hon'ble Prakash Padia,J.
Pursuant to the order passed by this Court, a short counter affidavit has been filed, the same is taken on record.
It is stated in the affidavit that admission has already been granted to the petitioner and this fact has not been denied by the counsel for the petitioner.
In view of the same, a prayer has been made that writ petition has become infructuous.
Accordingly, the the writ petition is dismissed as having become infructuous.
Order Date :- 11.1.2023 Swati
Digitally signed by :- SWATI PATHAK High Court of Judicature at Allahabad
Sayed Ahmed Shaheed
Union Of India
3 Others
Prakash Padia
Swati Pathak
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court