Petition seeking mandamus to stop interference in land possession dismissed. Court held the dispute was private in nature and non-justiciable under Article 226 of the Constitution of India, requiring no state interference.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
Neutral Citation No. - 2023:AHC:226055
Court No. - 51
Case :- WRIT - C No. - 38714 of 2023
Petitioner :- Radhey Shyam Respondent :- State Of U.P. And 3 Others Counsel for Petitioner :- Devid Kumar Singh,Divyansh Rai,Prateek Rai Counsel for Respondent :- C.S.C.
Hon'ble Chandra Kumar Rai,J.
Order Date :- 29.11.2023 Vandana Y.
Digitally signed by :- VANDANA YADAV High Court of Judicature at Allahabad
1 issue framed by the court
Whether this Court should interfere in a private dispute regarding land possession.
Radhey Shyam
State Of U.P.
Chandra Kumar Rai
Vandana Yadav
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
