The Allahabad High Court dismissed a writ petition filed by the petitioner seeking direction to lodge an FIR. The court held the petition misconceived as statutory remedies under Section 156(3) Cr.P.C. remained available.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
Neutral Citation No. - 2023:AHC:238712-DB
Court No. - 39
Case :- WRIT - C No. - 38485 of 2023
Petitioner :- Ankit Mishra
Respondent :- State Of U.P. And 2 Others Counsel for Petitioner :- Gyanendra Kumar Singh,Digvijay Singh,Sudhir Kumar Singh Counsel for Respondent :- C.S.C.
Hon'ble Saumitra Dayal Singh,J. Hon'ble Shiv Shanker Prasad,J.
(Shiv Shanker Prasad,J.) . . . (S.D. Singh,J)
Digitally signed by :- SAILESH KUMAR SRIVASTAVA High Court of Judicature at Allahabad
1 issue framed by the court
Whether a writ petition praying for FIR lodging is maintainable when statutory remedies under Section 156(3) Cr.P.C. are available.
1 provisions across 1 enactments
Ankit Mishra
State Of U.P.
Saumitra Dayal Singh
Shiv Shanker Prasad
Srivastava
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
